CHURCH OF BEATIFIED RESTITUTE, BRNO-LESNÁ, CZECH REPUBLIC (2020) Photo: BoysPlayNice Photography

MAREK ŠTĚPÁN

‘I REGARD THE INTERIOR OF A CHURCH AS A MIRROR OF THE LITTLE COSMOS WE HAVE WITHIN US.’

Photo: Tomáš Škoda

MAREK ŠTĚPÁN

‘I REGARD THE INTERIOR OF A CHURCH AS A MIRROR OF THE LITTLE COSMOS WE HAVE WITHIN US.’

Photo: Tomáš Škoda

CHURCH OF BEATIFIED RESTITUTE, BRNO-LESNÁ, CZECH REPUBLIC (2020) Photo: BoysPlayNice Photography

THE DOME OF THE CHURCH OF SISTER MARIA RESTITUTA IN BRNO REMINDED ARCHITECT MAREK ŠTĚPÁN OF A HUGE FINGERPRINT. “IT IS THE FINGER OF GOD TOUCHING US,” HE DECLARED.URE TO RESPOND TO THIS."

A circular space, a circular dome and a silky light caressing the surface of the walls: these are just some of the typical features of churches designed by the Czech architect Marek Štěpán, of Atelier Marek Štěpán. Of course individual projects differ a lot: one has delicate bronze reliefs, another a fused glass painting in bright colours, and a third with glass in the colours of the rainbow surrounding the dome. But these are features by which they distinguish themselves as “churches”. What does Štěpán find the main difference between designing a profane or a sacred space?

“Designing a house or a church requires the same kind of thinking. However, there is one important difference: symbolism. Only in a church are symbols needed. I once read a text by Abbot Suger, who wrote that the light that permeates and shapes matter to be a direct sign of ‘the Light of Lights’, meaning God Himself. Almost a thousand years have passed since he wrote these words, but I still agree with him. The main symbol of the presence of God in architecture is light. At unconscious and conscious levels, the light in the church represents the existence of the world beyond our physical experience and the existence of God. In order to refer to God, the source of the light must be veiled. The supernatural character of the light develops through diffusion. The light should be similar to the light in a forest, filtered by leaves. Old churches often have exactly this atmosphere, with daylight delicately touching the walls, the floor and the ceiling.”

CHURCH OF BEATIFIED RESTITUTE, BRNO-LESNÁ, CZECH REPUBLIC (2020) Photos: BoysPlayNice Photography

- Do you do a lot of research before designing your churches?

Yes, I have visited a lot of churches. I love old churches, especially Romanesque ones. By the beginning of the Romanesque people had lost touch with architectural knowledge of ancient Rome but they liked the way the Romans designed their buildings. The Romanesque architects built with passion, so the churches of this period exude a warm feeling. I like to compare Romanesque churches to potatoes: the shape is not geometrically exact but the feeling is warm and soothing. A circle won’t be perfectly round and the plasterwork may be uneven.”

- Why not strive for perfection in churches? Isn’t perfection the closest you can come to God?

“Perfection is just an idea. There is never a perfect floor or a perfect wall. You can always see traces of the human hand in the structure and materials, as a kind of signature. I’m fond of imperfections like these. God is perfect, but we as human beings can never achieve perfection. It is simply impossible. But you have to put effort into striving for perfection, because it implies an existence outside the world that you can see and touch. It is a world that is somewhere inside you, an intuition, not something you can prove. You have to meditate to connect with it. Sometimes you can feel this kind of connection with nature too. I went swimming in a river last summer, early in the morning. The water was cold and the air was misty, so I could only see the trees as vague contours. That was a sacred space, a moment of inspiration.”

- Geometry plays an important part in your church designs: the triangle, the circle. Why are you attracted to these geometrical shapes?

“Geometry can sanctify a space. This is how the sacred space was marked out thousands of years ago: they drew a geometrical shape in the sand and declared the space inside sacred. Perhaps these shapes are in our DNA, for you can understand them intuitively. In cultures all around the world, the circle is the symbol of God. By contrast, the square is the symbol of what is down-to-earth, the symbol for humans. The triangle represents the harmony of three different parts: it symbolizes the Trinity of the Son, the Father and the Holy Spirit.”

- The circle is the most prominent motif in your church designs. Why does it appeal to you architecturally, besides being a symbol of divinity?

“On one hand a circle has a distinct centre. On the other it is endless, without corners. The absence of corners gives a sense of safety, it seems to me, as if you are being cradled in the arms of God. If you are looking for answers in the church, if you want to contemplate or pray to God, you need to be in a specific atmosphere and to feel safe. But there are other reasons why we choose a circular shape for a church. The circle is also a symbol of fullness. It functions as a full stop, as a spiritual focal point offering refuge for people to get away from the daily hustle, to rest for a while or collect themselves. The circle is also an age-long symbol of heaven and eternity, in contrast to the square which refers to the earth and to transience. Heaven is reflected in the colourful annular window that surrounds the dome. It might be said that the circle is floating over the town of Lesná or, in a transcendental sense, that Heaven is floating over Lesná.”

- Although you have designed Catholic churches, they are rather sober, without many images, sculptures or ornaments. Is there something you don’t like about the richly embellished interiors of Baroque churches for which the Czech Republic is famous?

“Baroque church interiors are overloaded with information. They are too much to digest, in my opinion. Paintings and sculptures played an important part in the past when these churches were built. They told stories of the Old and the New Testament, a bit like comic books for those who couldn’t read. Today, our situation is totally different. But we can read, and we have the information that we need, so the less information in the church the better. This has consequences for the position of the priest as well. In Baroque times his position was hierarchical, so his job was to recite and explain the stories of the Bible. The organisation of the interior space consequently had to be longitudinal, with the priest and the most important paintings in front of the congregation, like a window to heaven. The circle, by contrast, is much closer to the contemporary perception of church liturgy, which represents the community of the Apostles and Jesus seated around the table during the Last Supper. A circular space is therefore more appropriate nowadays. It underlines that we together form a community. The authority of the church has dwindled, and the community and an awareness of being together has taken over.”

- If a church has a circular floor-plan, the question arises of where to situate the altar. Should it be right in the middle?

“The middle of the circle should be reserved for the event, the story that has to be told at that very moment – for instance a couple getting married, or a baby being baptized. When there is no event happening, there should be nothing at all: an absence that God will fill by His presence, by light. The dome emphasizes this empty centre and implies a vertical connection to God. When I started on the Church of Sister Maria Restituta in Brno, I was occupied with light and acoustics. But once the concrete casting for the dome was freed from its formwork, I could see the texture of the surface and it made me think of a fingertip. The surface suggested a huge fingerprint, of 25 meters in cross-section. It would be the finger of God touching us. Touching is for me a very important concept. A lot of energy is generated when touching takes place: the touching of two shapes, the touching of two people, the touching of our soul by God. The same happened with the altar in the Church of Saint Wenceslas in Sazovice. It looks heavy, as if made of solid brass, but it only just touches the ground, as though weightless. I did something similar with the wall of this church. It appears to be thin, almost cut out of paper. I wanted to generate the feeling that there is something beyond the material, something that exists even though we cannot see it, as if the material was dematerialised.”

CHURCH OF ST. WENCESLAS, SAZOVICE, CZECH REPUBLIC (2017) Photos: BoysPlayNice Photography

CHURCH OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, OSTRAVA, CZECH REPUBLIC (2007) Photos: Oto Nepilý

- The circle is a static form which modern architects tend to avoid. How do you try to make it more “alive”?

In the Church of Saint Wenceslas, I disrupted the perfection of the circle by snipping a piece out of it as though with scissors. This enabled me to create an entrance and also to admit some daylight from the sides – not direct but diffuse light. Cutting and deforming of the circle makes the interior space more dynamic, not so much due to the shape of the walls as by the effect of the light. It is a veiled light, like many things in our lives that are veiled. I regard the interior of a church as a mirror of the little cosmos we have within us.”

- Your churches have a large space for celebrating the Mass, but there are also balconies that are very different in scale and shape. Can you explain the purpose of this contrast?

“They give you a better idea of the space. You can understand it better if you go up to the balcony and view the interior from different perspective. That is one reason. The other reason has to do with scale. The small scale is that of an individual person, and the big scale is that of the community. I am fascinated by this difference in scale. It makes it harder to grasp the size of the building and its interior space. The ambiguity of scale creates a feeling of flying – not of physical flying but of flying in time. Time passes by, but the building stays waiting for us, as though in a painting by De Chirico.”

-You are a modern architect and you use a modern architectural vocabulary. Was it hard to reconcile that with how Catholic churches have long been supposed look?

“To Catholics, I am a modernist. But my churches are not as modern as they look at first sight. They have classical, conservative roots. The proportions are classical, and the church has a nave, a dome and a tower. You cannot look outside, because the windows are high up. Only the simplicity of the form could be called modern. But what really counts for me, is that my churches speak to non-believers. They discuss the building and they visit it because they like the feeling it exudes and its symbolism. You could call it architectural evangelism: their emotions are touched by it.”